In certain circumstances, the person may kill the perpetrator if he exercises the right to private defence. Section 102 of the Penal Code provides that the right to private defence may extend to the wilful cause of death of the offender if: For further information and reading, private defence is a statutory right under sections 96 to 106 of the Singapore Penal Code. [2] Mavis Wong, “Molest victims are not just speaking up, they are fighting back,” The Straits Times (December 3, 2018) (accessed October 19, 2019). By default, the thin skull rule establishes guilt in you for hurting someone else, self-defense or not. Coupled with SG law enforcement that disapproves of self-defense, you`d better have a very good reason to confuse this person. The right of a person to private defence against an act committed or attempted by a public servant may be deprived of a person only if he knows or has reason to believe that the perpetrator of the act is one of those officials. In addition, a person shall not be deprived of the right to defend himself in a private capacity against an act done or attempted under the direction of a public servant, unless he knows or has reason to believe that the person performing the act is acting under that direction, or unless the person performing the act indicates the power of attorney: by virtue of which it acts. or if he has a written power of attorney, unless he presents it on request. This essentially means that you have the right to protect yourself or others, property, body or life from physical harm or injury. As part of the CrossFit Defense Charter, we teach students that violence must match danger. This is in accordance with Article 99(4) of the Criminal Code, which states that one cannot do more harm than is necessary to defend oneself. If it is clear that the aggressor has been repulsed or defeated, it makes no sense for an ongoing attack in the name of private defense.
Singapore is notorious for its relatively low crime rates, which give citizens and visitors a sense of security – so much so that some of us wouldn`t think of learning more about Singapore`s right to self-defence. If there is a well-founded concern about property damage, the right to defence of private property applies. In case of theft, this right remains in force until the thief has fled with the property, until assistance is obtained from the authorities or until the property is recovered. In situations of robbery, the right to defend private property remains in effect as long as the thief causes or attempts to cause death, assault or unlawful coercion to a person, or if the fear of immediate death, assault or personal coercion persists. This right to defend private property against criminal intrusion or mischief remains in effect as long as the perpetrator commits the crime. The right to defend private property remains in force in night burglaries as long as the intrusion triggered by such burglary continues. However, you are not allowed to use more force than necessary to defend yourself. Therefore, using a weapon for self-defense, whether it is a counterfeit or genuine weapon, could be considered excessive if the attacker did not use a weapon against you. Although the RFP law is deceptively simple, in practice, the court will consider many factors before granting you the right to the RFP (as discussed in this article).
Therefore, the use of this defence may not lead to success in court (if success means a finding of not guilty). However, since you are unlikely to be charged if you simply push your stalker away, for example, the RFP will likely not be relevant to you. If you are ever harassed, the basic rule to avoid legal consequences would be to defend yourself (without police intervention), but to ensure that any harm caused to the offender is not exaggerated. It seems that these skills, acquired through self-defense classes, could prove useful after all. Under article 105 of the Criminal Code, the right to defence based on private property also extends, subject to certain restrictions, to any person who intentionally causes the death of the offender in order to defend his property. However, this only applies if there is a threat to one`s own property or that of someone else in one of the following situations: Private defense (self-defense) includes defending your life and body from physical harm such as injury and rape. It also includes the right to defend your property, movable (such as a car) or immovable property (such as a house), against theft, robbery, mischief and criminal trespassing. It also includes the right to protect another person or their property. They may not carry weapons for self-defence. Under the right to self-defence, you can defend yourself or your property against a crime. Right of self-defense Singapore: The right to private defense can be exercised to defend your property.
| Photo: iStock If the crime does not fall into one of the categories listed above, the right to private body defense does not extend to the wilful infliction of death on the aggressor, but to the wilful infliction of injury other than the murder of the aggressor. Unless you`re literally in a movie scene and he kills you, you`ll probably be responsible if you beat him again. People think self-defense is easy, “he hit me, I hit him back mah,” but what distinguishes self-defense from direct combat is the responsiveness of everything. The moment you proactively beat him, it`s no longer self-defense, you`re both in a fight. A different punishment then for both of you. According to article 100 of the Criminal Code, the right to private defence may also be exercised if there is a risk that an innocent person will be injured or killed if this right is exercised.