JNOV is the practice in U.S. courts where the judge presiding over a civil jury trial can overturn a jury`s decision and overturn or alter its verdict. Literally, the judge falls into a verdict regardless of the jury`s verdict. The intervention rarely granted allows the judge to exercise his or her discretion to avoid extreme and inappropriate jury decisions. [3] Regardless of the verdict, the verdict is also called a non-obstante veredicto or JNOV judgment, a type of verdict sometimes rendered at the end of a jury trial. In cases brought before U.S. federal civil courts, the term has been replaced by renewed judgment as a point of law, emphasizing its relationship to judgment as a point of law, formerly known as directed judgment. [1] In U.S. federal criminal cases, the term is “verdict of acquittal.” [2] A JNOV is only appropriate if the judge finds that no reasonable jury could have reached the verdict. For example, if a party does not present evidence of an essential element of his case, but the jury still rules in his favor, the court may decide that no reasonable jury would have ignored the lack of evidence on this key point and overturned the verdict. A verdict regardless of the verdict, a legal motion asking the court to overturn the jury`s verdict on the grounds that the jury could not reasonably have reached such a verdict.
“Non obstante veredicto.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/non%20obstante%20veredicto. Retrieved 9 November 2022. A jury`s verdict is overturned by a judge if he or she finds that there were insufficient facts on which the jury`s verdict was based or that the verdict did not properly apply the law. This procedure is similar to a situation where a judge orders a jury to reach a particular verdict called a directed verdict. A verdict, regardless of the verdict, is sometimes rendered when a jury refuses to follow a judge`s instructions to reach a particular verdict. [4] A much more detailed analysis with recognition of relationships or clauses can be found in our sentence analysis! Try! You must – there are over 200,000 words in our free online dictionary, but you`re looking for one that is only included in the full Merriam-Webster dictionary. A judge cannot list a JNOV as “guilty” after an acquittal by the jury in U.S. criminal cases. Such an action would violate a defendant`s right not to be subject to double jeopardy and the right of a Sixth Amendment to a jury trial.
However, if the judge grants a request to overturn the verdict after the jury has been convicted, the appeal may be quashed by the prosecution. Most of the sentences are from Wikipedia under a Creative Commons license. Supported by Black`s Law Dictionary, Free 2nd ed., and The Law Dictionary. a Latin term for the situation in which a jury decides the case in favour of one party, but the judge overturns the jury`s decision. Also known as the verdict despite the verdict. A judge`s decision to rule in favour of a losing party, even if the jury`s verdict was in favour of the other party. Usually, if the facts or the law do not support the jury`s verdict. Start your free trial today and get unlimited access to America`s largest dictionary with: Find more Latin words with our advanced search feature. This article, which refers to the law of the United States or its constituent jurisdictions, is a heel. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.